The Pragmatics of Interruption: A Comparative Analysis of Gender Differences in English and Arabic Conversations

Authors

  • Ulla Kamal Ismael University of Maysan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37630/jpb.v15i3.3117

Keywords:

Interruption, Gender, Pragmatics, Comparative Study, English, Arabic

Abstract

This study explores the complex dynamics of interruption in conversations, with a particular focus on gender differences within English and Arabic linguistic contexts. As a widely observed conversational feature, interruption reveals underlying power dynamics and social roles shaped by cultural norms. The researcher applies a mixed-methods approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative analyses of recorded conversations from English and Arabic-speaking communities. The findings highlight notable variations in interruption patterns between the two languages, uncovering distinct cultural and linguistic practices. Through a comparative lens, this study offers a nuanced understanding of how gender influences the frequency, types, and functions of interruptions, thereby enriching the field of pragmatics and contributing to the broader discourse on gendered communication.

References

Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. Oxford University Press.

Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 941–951.

Fishman, P. M. (1980). Conversational insecurity. Oxford University Press.

Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.

Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men, and politeness. Longman.

Jefferson, G. (1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 2(2), 181–199.

LaFrance, M. (1982). Posture mirroring and rapport. In M. Davis (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior (pp. 279–298). Human Sciences Press.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Li, C., & Cui, L. (2018). Gender differences in interruption in Chinese TV talk shows. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 28(1), 121–141.

Oetzel, J. G., & Ting-Toomey, S. (2003). Face concerns in interpersonal conflict: A cross-cultural empirical test of the face negotiation theory. Communication Research, 30(6), 599–624.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

Speer, S. A. (2007). Gender talk: Feminism, discourse, and conversation analysis. Routledge.

Speer, S. A. (2007). Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis in terms of relationally neutral, power- and solidarity-oriented acts. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 347–374.

Speer, S. A., & Parsons, E. C. (2006). The gender of interruptions: Do women interrupt more than men? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.

Speer, S. A., & Parsons, E. C. (2006). Gender and politeness in an ESL context. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3(1), 91–110.

Stewart, J. E., & McDermott, C. (2004). Gender in language and discourse. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. William Morrow.

Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender & Society, 9(1), 8–37.

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1975). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.

Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105–129). Newbury House

Downloads

Published

2025-07-04

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 3 (2025): JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA

Section

Articles

License

  1. Seluruh materi yang terdapat dalam situs ini dilindungi oleh undang-undang. Dilarang mengutip sebagian atau seluruh isi situs web ini untuk keperluan komersil tanpa persetujuan dewan penyunting jurnal ini.
  2. Apabila anda menemukan satu atau beberapa artikel yang terdapat dalam Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa yang melanggar atau berpotensi melanggar hak cipta yang anda miliki, silahkan laporkan kepada kami, melalui email pada Principle Contact.
  3. Aspek legal formal terhadap akses setiap informasi dan artikel yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini mengacu pada ketentuan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  4. Semua Informasi yang terdapat di Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa bersifat akademik. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap kerugian yang terjadi karana penyalah gunaan informasi dari situs ini.