Pengembangan Buku Ajar Fisika Matematika Berbasis Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi yang Terintegrasi Nilai Filsafat: Uji Praktikalitas

Authors

  • Widya Wati UIN Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v14i2.1683

Keywords:

Praktikalitas, Buku Ajar, Fisika Matematika, Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi, Filsafat

Abstract

Uji lanjut pengembangan buku ajar diperlukan untuk memastikan kualitas buku ajar dapat digunakan dan diimplementasikan dengan baik dalam pembelajaran, oleh sebab itu dilakukan uji kepraktisan, untuk mengetahui kualitas pengembangan buku ajar. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengebangan pada uji lebih lanjut yakni uji Praktikalitas yang meliputi uji respon dosen dan mahasiswa, serta ujicoba terbatas keterlaksanaan pembelajaran. Uji respon dosen menilai kesesuaian materi, kemudahan penggunaan, kejelasan konsep, tampilan visual, dan ketepatan bahasa melalui kuesioner. Sementara, uji respon mahasiswa fokus pada keterbacaan dan kemenarikan buku. UJi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran mengevaluasi perencanaan, pelaksanaan, pengelolaan kelas, evaluasi, serta relevansi materi dengan kreativitas dan inovasi. Hasil menunjukkan skor rata-rata 4.3 dalam kesesuaian materi, kemudahan penggunaan, kejelasan konsep, tampilan visual, dan ketepatan bahasa, serta 4.7 dalam dukungan keterampilan berpikir tinggi dan integrasi nilai filsafat. Respon mahasiswa mencatat skor 4.4 untuk keterbacaan dan 4.3 untuk kemenarikan. Skor untuk keterlaksanaan pembelajaran mencakup 4.5 dalam perencanaan, 4.3 dalam pelaksanaan, 4.7 dalam pengelolaan kelas, 4 dalam evaluasi, serta 4.3 dan 4.2 dalam relevansi materi dan inovasi. Secara keseluruhan, buku ini dinilai praktif dan layak sebagai sumber belajar yang berkualitas

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albus, P., & Seufert, T. (2023). The modality effect reverses in a virtual reality learning environment and influences cognitive load. Instructional Science, 51(4), 545–570.

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86.

Almekhlafi, A. G., Ismail, S. A., & Hassan, A. A. (2020). Teachers’ Reported Use of Marzano’s Instructional Strategies in United Arab Emirates K-12 Schools. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 325–340.

An, Y. (2021). A History of Instructional Media, Instructional Design, and Theories. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 1–21.

Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & Del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321–7338.

Brandmo, C., Panadero, E., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). Bridging classroom assessment and self-regulated learning. In Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice (Vol. 27, Issue 4, pp. 319–331). Taylor & Francis.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2023). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. john Wiley & sons.

Dasen, P. R. (2022). Culture and cognitive development. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(7–8), 789–816.

Hayat, A. A., Shateri, K., Amini, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2020). Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: a structural equation model. BMC Medical Education, 20, 1–11.

Huang, R., Tlili, A., Chang, T.-W., Zhang, X., Nascimbeni, F., & Burgos, D. (2020). Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: application of open educational practices and resources. Smart Learning Environments, 7, 1–15.

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Designing multimedia instruction in anatomy: An evidence‐based approach. Clinical Anatomy, 33(1), 2–11.

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons.

Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. In Language Teaching Research (Vol. 24, Issue 4, pp. 427–431). Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England.

Newton, P. M., Da Silva, A., & Peters, L. G. (2020). A pragmatic master list of action verbs for bloom’s taxonomy. Frontiers in Education, 5, 107.

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality.

Ninsiana, W., Gabidullina, F. I., Widodo, M., Patra, I., Pallathadka, H., Alkhateeb, D. A. A. M., Zainal, A. G., & Gheisari, A. (2022). High School Students’ Attitudes towards E‐Learning and Impacts of Online Instruction on Their General English Learning: Challenges and Issues. Education Research International, 2022(1), 9103862.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Focus on research methods: Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199

Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2024). Developing Mathematics Teaching Materials Using Maritime Context for Higher-Order Thinking in Junior High School. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 173–190.

Sabornie, E. J., & Espelage, D. L. (2023). Handbook of classroom management. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Samat, M. F., Awang, N. A., Hussin, S. N. A., & Nawi, F. A. M. (2020). Online Distance Learning amidst COVID-19 Pandemic among University Students: A Practicality of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 220–233.

Setyono, B., & Widodo, H. P. (2019). The representation of multicultural values in the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture-Endorsed EFL textbook: a critical discourse analysis. Intercultural Education, 30(4), 383–397.

Smets, W., De Neve, D., & Struyven, K. (2022). Responding to students’ learning needs: How secondary education teachers learn to implement differentiated instruction. Educational Action Research, 30(2), 243–260.

Suarniati, N. W., Ardhana, I. W., Hidayah, N., & Handarini, D. M. (2019). The difference between the effects of problembased learning strategy and conventional strategy on vocational school students’ critical thinking skills in civic education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(8), 155–167.

Supriyatno, T., Susilawati, S., & Hassan, A. (2020). E-learning development in improving students’ critical thinking ability. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1099–1106.

Tyas, M. A., Nurkamto, J., & Marmanto, S. (2020). Cultivating Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills in EFL Classes: The Role of the Teacher and the Textbook. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(1), 267–276.

Wicaksono, I., & Budiarso, A. S. (2020). Validity and Practicality of the Biotechnology Series Learning Model to Concept Mastery and Scientific Creativity. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 157–170.

Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. In Learning, media and technology (Vol. 45, Issue 2, pp. 107–114). Taylor & Francis.

Xu, F. (2019). Towards a rational constructivist theory of cognitive development. Psychological Review, 126(6), 841.

Ziernwald, L., Hillmayr, D., & Holzberger, D. (2022). Promoting high-achieving students through differentiated instruction in mixed-ability classrooms—A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(4), 540–573.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28