Development of Reading and Numeracy Literacy Assessment Instrument in Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solutions for Critical Thinking Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v16i4.4958Keywords:
Assessment, Reading Literacy, Numeracy Literacy, Critical Thinking Skills, Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte SolutionsAbstract
The development of assessment instruments that can measure reading literacy, numeracy literacy, and critical thinking skills is still a necessity in chemistry learning. This study aims to develop reading literacy and numeracy assessment instruments to measure critical thinking skills in the material of electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions. This study used a test design and development method based on the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. The instrument was validated by five experts and tested on 21 tenth-grade high school students. Data analysis included content validity (CVR), empirical validity (Pearson Product Moment), reliability (KR-20 and Cronbach's Alpha), difficulty level, and distinguishing power. The results showed excellent content validity, with CVR values of 0.992, 1.000, and 0.968, respectively. Of the 35 items, 23 (65.71%) were empirically valid. The reliability coefficients were 0.70 for multiple choice, 0.93 for essay, 0.72 for complex multiple choice – true/false, and 0.15 for matching. The difficulty level was dominated by the moderate category (57%). distinguishing power shows that 55% of the test items are in the fair to good category. Overall, the instrument met most of the quality criteria and showed potential for assessing reading comprehension, numeracy, and critical thinking skills, although further improvements were suggested.
Downloads
References
Amelia, R. N., & Saputri, N. Y. (2026). Developing a Minimum Competency Assessment in Science Literacy: A Rasch-Model Approach on Elements, Compounds, and Mixtures. Unnes Science Education Journal, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v15i1.34242
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam, Kementerian Agama RI.
Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (3rd ed.). Bumi Aksara.
BSKAP. (2025). Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Nomor 046/H/KR/2025 tentang capaian pembelajaran pada pendidikan anak usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah.
Couture, É. M., Chouinard, M.-C., Fortin, M., & Hudon, C. (2017). The relationship between health literacy and quality of life among frequent users of health care services: a cross-sectional study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0716-7
Cuhanazriansyah, M. R., Perta, H., & Wildan, A. (2025). Platform Penilaian Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi: Tinjauan Bentuk dan Tantangan. Journal of Educational Research and Community Service, 1, 190–196.
Djaali, & Muljono. (2008). Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Grasindo.
Eljinsa, S. M., & Zamhari, M. (2024). A Powtoon Animation Video Development Utilizing a Scientific Approach for Teaching Electrolyte and Non-electrolyte Solutions. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(11), 8985–8995. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.9545
Evans, K. R., Lewis, M. J., & Hudson, S. V. (2012). The Role of Health Literacy on African American and Hispanic/Latino Perspectives on Cancer Clinical Trials. Journal of Cancer Education, 27(2), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0300-5
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What itCritical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts is and why it counts.
Fatimah, L. U., & Alfath, K. (2019). ANALISIS KESUKARAN SOAL, DAYA PEMBEDA DAN FUNGSI DISTRAKTOR. Al-Manar, 8(2), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.36668/jal.v8i2.115
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.
Hapudin, M. S., & Mujazi, M. (2024). In House Training (IHT) Increasing Teacher Competencies in Building Literacy and Numeration Learning Strategies. Aktual: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.58723/aktual.v2i1.171
Ilahi, D. S. K., Zaini, F. M., Muhammad, B., Humaidi, H., Zakiyullah, A., & Sofa, A. R. (2025). Penilaian Pembelajaran PAI Berbasis Google Forms, Quizizz, dan Grade Scope: Indonesian Research Journal on Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v5i2.2308
Inganah, S., Utomo, D. P., Baiduri, B., & Djunaidi, A. (2023). Accompaniment of Contextual Learning Oriented Minimum Competency Assessment of Mathematics through Lesson Study. Berdikari: Jurnal Inovasi Dan Penerapan Ipteks, 11(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.18196/berdikari.v11i2.17692
Iqlima, I., Haryanto, H., Miharti, I., Asrial, A., & Ekaputra, F. (2026). Pengembangan PowerPoint Interaktif Berbantuan Canva pada Materi Ikatan Kimia untuk Menumbuhkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA, 16(4), 1351–1361. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v16i4.4833
Jahro, I. S., Sutiani, A., Suryani, S., & Nugraha, A. W. (2024). Improving Students’ HOTs-Literacy Abilities Through Making Summaries at The End of Learning. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Kimia, 6(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.24114/jipk.v6i1.57484
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2025). Rapor Pendidikan Indonesia 2025: Capaian dan Agenda Perbaikan. Pusat Standar dan Kebijakan Pendidikan, Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4).
Muharromah, F., Al Fani, F., & Ridho, A. R. (2025). RELIABILITAS ALAT UKUR: JENIS-JENIS, CARA PENGUKURAN, DAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHINYA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN. JIPDAS (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 63–73.
Nahadi, & Firman, H. (2019). Asesmen Pembelajaran Kimia. UPI Press.
Nasruddin, N., & Jahring, J. (2024). Profile of Junior High School Students’ Creative Thinking Ability and Numerical Literacy in Solving Mathematical Problems. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 12(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v12i1.8577
Prasetyani, K., Ati, L. L., Rondli, W. S., & Kanzunnudin, M. (2024). Quality Analysis of Grade 6 Literacy and Numeracy End-of-Semester Exam Questions Based on Classical Test Theory. Jurnal Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.70277/jgsd.v1i1.0001
Putri, M, Krisnaningsih, E, Suprapro, N, Deta, U, Dwikoranto, & D. (2021). Project -based learning (PjBL )-STEM: Bibliometric analysis and research trends (2016 –2020). Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 368. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v9i3.11184
Rahmawati, A., & Kamaludin, A. (2023). Development of Motion Graphic Video for Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solutions to Increase Senior High School Students’ Interest in Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1753–1764. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.1777
Ramadhan, M. F., Siroj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2024). Validitas and Reliabilitas. Journal on Education, 6(2), 10967–10975. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i2.4885
Ridhoni, W., Punaji Setyosari, Dedi Kuswandi, Saida Ulfa, & Dahlia Janan. (2022). CC Thinker: Mobile-based Assessment to Train Creative and Critical Thinking in Students. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 16(15), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i15.29991
Riduwan. (2013). Dasar-dasar Statistika. Alfabeta.
Saputri, S. V., Dayanti, N., Sari, R. K., Sartika, R. P., & Hadi, L. (2022). DEVELOPMENT OF CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY ORIENTED TEXTBOOK ON ELECTROLYTE AND NON-ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION MATERIALS. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 13(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v13i1.34741
Sarea, M. S., & Ruslan, R. (2019). KARAKTERISTIK BUTIR SOAL: CLASSICAL TEST THEORY VS ITEM RESPONSE THEORY? DIDAKTIKA : Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30863/didaktika.v13i1.296
Shidiq, A. S., Yamtinah, S., Masykuri, M., Ulfa, M., & Mulyani, B. (2022). Penguatan Kemampuan Guru-Guru Kimia SMA di Surakarta dalam Menyiapkan Instrumen AKM Literasi Membaca dan Numerasi berbasis Sains Kimia. Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(4), 1402. https://doi.org/10.20527/btjpm.v4i4.6158
Silvia, S., Hamzah, B., & Mustapa, K. (2021). Thinking Ability and Student Learning Outcomes in the Material of Electrolyte and Non Electrolyte Solutions at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan MIPA, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22487/j25490192.2021.v5.i1.pp1-8
Siswaningsih, W., Susetyo, B., Ariesta, A. S., & Rahmawati, T. (2023). Implementation of minimum competency assessment (MCA) containing ethnoscience on the topic of electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions. 090009. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113856
Slamet, R., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2022). VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS TERHADAP INSTRUMEN KEPUASAN KER. Aliansi : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.46975/aliansi.v17i2.428
Sudirman, S., Sarjan, M., Rokhmat, J., Hamidi, H., & Fauzi, I. (2022). Penilaian Pendidikan IPA secara Realtime dan Terintegrasi dengan Artificial Intelligence: Perspektif Filsafat. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(4b). https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i4b.888
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Sulistyaningrum, H, Nuraida, D, Ismail, A, Andik, & M. (2024). The effectiveness of use of PowerPoint–iSpring interactive learning media on student creativity. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 6 (3), 83 –90. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2024.6.3.9
Utami, L., Festiyed, Dian Purnama Ilahi, Arista Ratih, Elvi yenti, & Lazulva. (2024). ANALISIS INDEKS AIKEN UNTUK MENGETAHUI VALIDITAS ISI INSTRUMEN SCINETIFIC HABBITS OF MIND. Journal of Research and Education Chemistry, 6(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.25299/jrec.2024.vol6(1).17430
Ware, K., Mole, P. N., & Nirmalasari, M. A. Y. (2024). Validitas dan Keterbacaan Integrated Assesment Literasi Kimia dan HOTS Bermuatan Etnosains Daerah Sikka pada Materi Asam Basa. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA, 14(4), 1103–1112. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v14i4.2073
Warju, W., Ariyanto, S. R., Soeryanto, S., & Trisna, R. A. (2020). ANALISIS KUALITAS BUTIR SOAL TIPE HOTS PADA KOMPETENSI SISTEM REM DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH KEJURUAN. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 17(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v17i1.22914
Widianto, P. C., Fadhilawati, D., Sutanti, N., & Supriyono. (2024). Examining Quizalize’s Impact on Students’ Reading Comprehension Mastery. Jurnal Pendidikan : Riset Dan Konseptual, 8(2), 338. https://doi.org/10.28926/riset_konseptual.v8i2.983
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amelia Ineza Karma, Triannisa Rahmawati, Wiwi Siswaningsih, Nahadi Nahadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Seluruh materi yang terdapat dalam situs ini dilindungi oleh undang-undang. Dilarang mengutip sebagian atau seluruh isi situs web ini untuk keperluan komersil tanpa persetujuan dewan penyunting jurnal ini.
- Apabila anda menemukan satu atau beberapa artikel yang terdapat dalam Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA yang melanggar atau berpotensi melanggar hak cipta yang anda miliki, silahkan laporkan kepada kami, melalui email pada Principle Contact.
- Aspek legal formal terhadap akses setiap informasi dan artikel yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini mengacu pada ketentuan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Semua Informasi yang terdapat di Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA bersifat akademik. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap kerugian yang terjadi karana penyalah gunaan informasi dari situs ini.
