Problem Solving Confidence dalam Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Ditinjau dari Gender
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v16i5.5257Keywords:
Problem Solving Confidence, Gender, Pemecahan MasalahAbstract
Kepercayaan diri dalam memecahkan masalah (problem solving confidence/PSC) merupakan aspek afektif penting dalam pembelajaran fisika, sementara temuan tentang peran gender belum konsisten. Penelitian kuantitatif dengan desain survei deskriptif-komparatif ini menganalisis PSC ditinjau dari gender pada 53 siswa kelas XI IPA (26 laki-laki dan 27 perempuan) di dua SMA di Kecamatan Salahutu, Maluku Tengah, yang dipilih dengan convenience sampling. Data dikumpulkan dengan angket PSC 13 butir dan dianalisis menggunakan uji Mann-Whitney U, ukuran efek, dan regresi dengan sekolah sebagai kovariat. Rerata PSC siswa perempuan (41,19; kategori tinggi) lebih tinggi daripada siswa laki-laki (34,38; kategori sedang), dengan perbedaan signifikan (U = 152,5; p < 0,001; r = 0,49) dan arah yang konsisten di kedua sekolah. Tujuh siswa laki-laki menunjukkan pola respons seragam, tanpa mereka perbedaan tetap signifikan (p = 0,020) dengan efek lebih kecil (r = 0,34). Penelitian lanjutan disarankan menggunakan sampel acak yang lebih luas dan tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah
Downloads
References
Daftar Pustaka
Brage-del-Río, M., Martin-Núñez, J. L., & Pablo-Lerchundi, I. (2025). Educational strategies to reduce the gender gap in the self-efficacy of high school students in STEM teaching. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1553001. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1553001
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cwik, S., & Singh, C. (2022). Gender differences in students’ self-efficacy in introductory physics courses in which women outnumber men predict their grade. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2), 20142. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020142
Delacre, M., Lakens, D., & Leys, C. (2017). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.82
Espinosa, T., Miller, K., Araujo, I., & Mazur, E. (2019). Reducing the gender gap in students’ physics self-efficacy in a team- and project-based introductory physics class. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 10132. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010132
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fitriani, A., & Santiani. (2025). Analisis Literatur: Pendekatan Pembelajaran Deep Learning dalam Pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara (JINU), 2(3), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v2i3.4357
Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338
Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
Haeruddin, Kamaluddin, Amiruddin Kade, A. R. P. (2022). Radiasi : Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika Analysis of Attitudes and Approaches to Problem Solving : Gender Differences and Education Levels. 15(1), 12–21.
Haeruddin, Kamaluddin, Kade, A., & Pabianan, A. R. (2022). Analysis of Attitudes and Approaches to Problem Solving: Gender Differences and Education Levels. Radiasi: Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.37729/radiasi.v15i1.1816
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
Li, Y., & Singh, C. (2022). Do female and male students’ physics motivational beliefs change in a two-semester introductory physics course sequence? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 10142. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010142
Li, Y., & Singh, C. (2023). Impact of perceived recognition by physics instructors on women’s self-efficacy and interest. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 20125. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020125
Mason, A. J., & Singh, C. (2016). Surveying college introductory physics students’ attitudes and approaches to problem solving. European Journal of Physics, 37(5), 55704. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/5/055704
Nissen, J. M. (2019). Gender differences in self-efficacy states in high school physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 13102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.013102
Nuraini, P., & Putri, R. M. (2025). Gender dan self efficacy: Sebuah kajian perbandingan pada siswa SMA Negeri 1 Indralaya. FOKUS: Kajian Bimbingan Dan Konseling Dalam Pendidikan, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.22460/fokus.v8i4.27784
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I and II) - Country Notes: Indonesia. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/indonesia_c2e1ae0e-en/
Peres, F. F. (2026). Effect sizes for nonparametric tests. Biochemia Medica, 36(1), 10101. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2026.010101
Prahani, B. K., Kristiyanto, W. H., Siswanto, J., Saputro, B., & Mubarok, H. (2021). Thinking Process Profile of Senior High School Students in Physics Problem-Solving: Terms of Differences in Emotional Intelligence Levels and Gender. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v9i3.10659
Santana, L. M., & Singh, C. (2023). Effects of male-dominated physics culture on undergraduate women. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 20134. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020134
Siregar, R. (2025). Self-Efficacy and Peer Support as Predictors of Physics Problem-Solving Ability of High School Students. Educofa, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.24952/ejpm.v2i2.17397
Stoeckel, M., & Roehrig, G. (2021). Gender differences in classroom experiences impacting self-efficacy in an AP Physics 1 classroom. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 20102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020102
Stratton, S. J. (2021). Population research: Convenience sampling strategies. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 36(4), 373–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X21000649
Wandi, Suwarma, I. R., Liliawati, W., Mardianti, F., & Amelia, R. (2024). Analysis of Student Attitudes and Beliefs in Physics Education. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 9(3), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5473
Ward, M. K., & Meade, A. W. (2023). Dealing with careless responding in survey data: Prevention, identification, and recommended best practices. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-040422-045007
Zeng, B., Jeon, M., & Wen, H. (2024). How does item wording affect participants’ responses in Likert scale? Evidence from IRT analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1304870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1304870
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Carolina Sri Athena Barus, Lisa Sutami Suharlan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Seluruh materi yang terdapat dalam situs ini dilindungi oleh undang-undang. Dilarang mengutip sebagian atau seluruh isi situs web ini untuk keperluan komersil tanpa persetujuan dewan penyunting jurnal ini.
- Apabila anda menemukan satu atau beberapa artikel yang terdapat dalam Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA yang melanggar atau berpotensi melanggar hak cipta yang anda miliki, silahkan laporkan kepada kami, melalui email pada Principle Contact.
- Aspek legal formal terhadap akses setiap informasi dan artikel yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini mengacu pada ketentuan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Semua Informasi yang terdapat di Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA bersifat akademik. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap kerugian yang terjadi karana penyalah gunaan informasi dari situs ini.
