Persepsi Pemahaman Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik di MTsN 11 Tasikmalaya
Abstract
Hasil penelitian di beberapa daerah di Indonesia dan beberapa negara menunjukkan keterampilan argumentasi peserta didik masih rendah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis pemahaman peserta didik terhadap argumentasi ilmiah di MTsN 11 Tasikmalaya . Populasi penelitian ini berjumlah 586 peserta didik dan sampel sebanyak 155 peserta didik kelas IX yang dipilih melalui teknik purposive sampling. Instrumen utama yang digunakan adalah angket berbasis skala Likert, sementara wawancara dengan peserta didik dan guru IPA dilakukan sebagai data sekunder. Komponen argumentasi ilmiah yang diukur meliputi klaim, bukti, jaminan, dan dukungan. Proses analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif kuantitatif mencakup empat langkah utama: (1) menghitung total skor rata-rata setiap komponen argumentasi ilmiah, (2) mengkonversi skor, dan (3) menghitung rata-rata persentase pemahaman peserta didik per komponen, dan (4) mengelompokkannya berdasarkan kategori. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi pemahaman peserta didik terhadap komponen argumentasi ilmiah masih rendah di semua indikator. Berdasarkan hasil wawancara penyebab utama rendahnya pemahaman peserta didik terhadap argumentasi ilmiah adalah kurangnya pengalaman secara praktis dalam pembelajaran dalam melatihkan argumentasi ilmiah. Rekomendasi dari penelitian ini adalah perlunya perubahan strategi pengajaran dengan pendekatan berbasis masalah, inkuiri, dan penemuan, serta pengembangan bahan ajar yang melatih keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah.
Downloads
References
A. N. M. Fauziah et al. (2024). Relationship Between Critical Thinking and Scientific Argumentation in Science Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): June 2024). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/pwqxcp96
Agustina, N. S., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2024). Implementation of the Inquiry-Oriented RADEC Learning Model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i1.5119
Ain, T. N., Wibowo, H. A. C., Rohman, A., & Deta, U. A. (2018). The scientific argumentation profile of physics teacher candidate in Surabaya. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/012025
Al-Ajmi, B., & Ambusaidi, A. (2019). The level of scientific argumentation skills in chemistry. Science Education International, 33(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i1.7
Allchin, D., & Zemplén, G. (2020). Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and Whole Science. Science Education, 104(5), 907–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21589
Ambarawati, D. S. H. E., Muslim, M., & Hernani, H. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa SMP pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v10i1.29780
Andryani Putri, N., & Trianita Wilman, A. (2023). Perbandingan Antara Growth Mindset Dan Fixed Mindset Dampaknya Pada Prestasi Akademik. Muntazam, 04(01), 51–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35706/muntazam.v4i01.9497
Annisa, A. A., & Fatmahanik, U. (2023). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Berbasis STEM terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Siswa pada Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v3i1.693
Arbain, I. H., Rahayuningtyas, W., & Pristiati, T. (2023). Strategi Pembelajaran Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ansambel Musik Siswa SMP. JoLLA: Journal of Language, Literature, and Arts, 3(3), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.17977/um064v3i32023p406-419
Arsyim, I., Rubini, B., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2022). Socio Scientific Issues-Based Argumentation Assessment for Middle School Students. In Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (Vol. 8, Nomor 2, hal. 1034–1041). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.844
Azzahroh, S. N. F., Septaria, K., & Wulandari, S. A. (2024). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Bermuatan Nature Of Science (NOS) Terhadap Argumentasi Ilmiah Pada Topik Zat Aditif. Jurnal Penelitian Sains dan Pendidikan (JPSP), 4(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.23971/jpsp.v4i1.7423
Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590–1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958
Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003731135
Berkle, Y., Schmitt, L., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., Wambsganss, T., Leimeister, J. M., & Leuchter, M. (2023). Measuring university students’ ability to recognize argument structures and fallacies. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(December), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1270931
Brockriede, W. (1974). Rhetorical criticism as argument. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637409383222
Choden, T., & Kijkuakul, S. (2020). Blending problem based learning with scientific argumentation to enhance students’ understanding of basic genetics. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13129a
Choi, A., & Hand, B. (2020). Students’ Construct and Critique of Claims and Evidence Through Online Asynchronous Discussion Combined with In-Class Discussion. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(6), 1023–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10005-4
Dana L. Zeidler, & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
Deb, D., Dey, R., & Balas, V. E. (2019). Contributions, Arguments, and Dealing with Criticisms. In: Engineering Research Methodology. Intelligent Systems Reference Library. Springer, 153, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2947-0
Deke, O., Astria, A., Jewaru, L., & Kaleka, Y. U. (2022). Engineering Design Process pada STEM melalui Authentic PBL dan Asesmen Formatif : Meninjau Desain Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Terkait Termodinamika. Borneo Journal of Science and Mathematics Education BJSME: Borneo Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 2022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21093/bjsme.v2i3.5948
Dewantari, N., & Singgih, S. (2020). Penerapan Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE), 3(2), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.31002/nse.v3i2.1085
Dishon, G., & Gilead, T. (2021). Adaptability and Its Discontents: 21St-Century Skills and the Preparation for an Unpredictable Future. British Journal of Educational Studies, 69(4), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2020.1829545
Dwiretno, G., & Setyarsih, W. (2018). Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (IPF), Vol. 07(Vol. 07 No. 02, Juli 2018,), 337–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v7n2.p%25p
Ermawati, I. R., Anomeisa, A. B., & Seputra, H. (2019). Pengaruh Ketrampilan Proses Sains Terintegrasi Karakter Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v7i1.1923
Erna Muliastrini, N. K., Nyoman, D., & Gede Rasben, D. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri dengan Teknik Scaffolding Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains dan Prestasi Belajar IPA. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(3), 254. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v3i3.14116
Fadillah, A. R., & Suyono, S. (2024). Dampak Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry Berbantuan Lembar Penugasan Terstruktur Terhadap Peningkatan Keterampilan Argumentasi Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(3), 1873–1880. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i3.2496
Fadlika, R., Hernawati, D., & Meylani, V. (2022). Kemampuan Argumentasi Dan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Kelas Xi Mipa Pada Materi Sel. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 12(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v12i1.156
Fakhriyah, F., Rusilowati, A., Wiyanto, W., & Susilaningsih, E. (2021). Argument-Driven Inquiry Learning Model: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 767–784. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2001
Giri, V., & Paily, M. U. (2020). Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Critical Thinking. Science and Education, 29(3), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00120-y
Girsang, L. B., Trianton, T., & Syahfitri, D. (2024). Pengaruh Metode Debat Terhadap Kemampuan Menyusun Argumentasi Pada Siswa SMK. Jurnal Educatio, 10(3), 1015–1024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v10i3.9453
Hakim, A. R., Widodo, W., & Sunarti, T. (2022). Profile of Toulmin’s Scientific Arguments Students and Technological Utilities in Global Warming Topic. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 12(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v12n1.p85-99
Halimah, A. N., Harlita, H., & Dwiastuti, S. (2020). Discovery Learning Disertai Pertanyaan Divergen Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Biologi. Edusains, 12(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i1.12762
Hendratmoko, A. F., Madlazim, M., Widodo, W., Suyono, S., & Supardi, Z. A. I. (2023). Inquiry and Debate in Science Learning: Potential Strategy for Improving Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 114–138. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3152
Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2015). Malaysian Students’ Scientific Argumentation: Do groups perform better than individuals? International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.995147
Hill, J., & West, H. (2020). Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908
Ika Noviyanti, N., Rosyadah Mukti, W., Dahlia Yuliskurniawati, I., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2019). Students’ scientific argumentation skills based on differences in academic ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012034
Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2015). Supporting use of evidence in argumentation through practice in argumentation and reflection in the context of SOCRATES learning environment. In Science Education (Vol. 99, Nomor 2). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21152
Iordanou, K., & Rapanta, C. (2021). “Argue With Me”: A Method for Developing Argument Skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(March). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631203
Katowa-Mukwato, P., Chitundu, K., Monde, M. W., Maimbolwa, M. M., & Jere, L. D. (2022). Evidence based practice and critical thinking in nursing education and practice: A scoping review of literature. International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 14(4), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijnm2022.0511
Kaya, S., & Karakoc, D. (2022). Math Mindsets and Academic Grit: How Are They Related to Primary Math Achievement? European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(3), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11881
Khalil, M., Akbar, M. N., Ikalor, A., & Jannah, R. (2024). Implementasi PBL Berbasis Lesson Study untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pedagogi Hayati, 8(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31629/ph.v8i1.6853
Kuki, A. D., Agustini, R., & Azizah, U. (2023). Analysis of Effectiveness Argument-Driven Inquiry to Improve Students’ Argumentation Skill and Conceptual Understanding. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i3.316
Lazarou, D., & Erduran, S. (2021). “Evaluate What I Was Taught, Not What You Expected Me to Know”: Evaluating Students’ Arguments Based on Science Teachers’ Adaptations to Toulmin’s Argument Pattern. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1820663
Limbong, S. A., Dasna, I. W., & Munzil, M. (2023). Argumentation and Critical Thinking Skills with Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Learning Model: A Literature Review. Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI), 5(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.17977/um072v5i12023p37-46
Lisanyuk, E. N. (2022). Three Approaches to Criticisms and Support in Evaluation of Arguments. Discourse, 8(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-2-5-16
Magalhães, A. L. (2020). Teaching How to Develop an Argument Using the Toulmin Model. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Educational Research, 2(3), 01–07. www.ijmcer.com
Maulina, & Siregar, N. (2023). The Effectiveness of Debate Course in Improving The Students’ Critical Thinking at Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 22089–22099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i3.10034
Mellenia, R. P. A., & Admoko, S. (2022). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Pembelajaran Diskusi Berbasis Pola Argumentasi Toulmin untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi dan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 313. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v6i2.5248
Melta, D., Azhar, M., Yohandri, Y., Arsih, F., & Razak, A. (2024). Argument-driven inquiry learning model to improve students’ argumentation skills in science learning: systematic literature review. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 12(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v12i1.5843
Nanda A, Sukamto, S. (2024). Pengembangan modul ajar ipas berbasis STEM untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berargumen pada siswa fase c. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 09, 4897–4915. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i1.13094
Nurmalasari, P., & Ariyanti, N. A. (2021). The Profile of High School Students’ Reflective Judgment and Argumentation Skills in Biology. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 541(Isse 2020), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.012
Nurtamara, L., & Widyastuti, D. A. (2023). The Improving evidence-based argumentation on socioscientific issues through problem-based learning in science students. Biosfer, 16(2), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.35534
Nussbaum, E. M. (2021). Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1845173
Paembonan, E., Arsyad, N., & Kusmawan, U. (2023). Effectiveness of Inquiry Model with Scientific Approach and Experimental Methods in Science Learning for Elementary School. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 3(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.eduline1500
Ping, I. L. L., Halim, L., & Osman, K. (2020). Explicit teaching of scientific argumentation as an approach in developing argumentation skills, science process skills and biology understanding. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.276
Pitorini, D. E., Suciati, S., & Ariyanto, J. (2020). Kemampuan argumentasi siswa: Perbandingan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dan inkuiri terbimbing dipadu dialog Socrates. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.27761
Putri, P. A. W., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2020). Efektivitas Argument-Driven Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Ilmiah pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i1.13132
Putri, Y. R., Rusdi, M. R., & Syamsurizal. (2019). Penerapan Model Discovery Learning dengan Penugasan Portofolio untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa SMP. Edu-Sains, 8(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/jmpmipa.v8i2.9854
Rahayu, D. P., & Widodo, A. (2019). The profile of scientific argumentation skill student’s using “Toulmin argumentation pattern” analysis in the solving energy problem on the students of class VII. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1481, 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318396.3318421
Rahayu, R., & Effendi, M. H. (2020). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berpola Claim, Data, Warrant (Cdw) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa. BIOEDUSAINS:Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains, 3(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v3i2.1790
Rahman, A., Diantoro, M., & Yuliati, L. (2018). Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Hukum Newton di Sekolah Menengah Atas. 903–911. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i7.11337
Rini, C. P., Dwi Hartantri, S., & Amaliyah, A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Pada Aspek Kompetensi Mahasiswa PGSD FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 6(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.29407/jpdn.v6i2.15320
Riswandani, M. A., & Safrina, P. (2024). Pembelajaran Inkuiri Dengan Strategi Argument Mapping. 332–339. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/snipa/article/view/3694
Rochman, C., Mahen, E. C. S., & Nasrudin, D. (2018). Authentic Assessment Based on Teaching and Learning Trajectory With Student Activity Sheet (Sas) on Basic Physics Courses. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v3i1.10373
Rohayati, Syihabuddin, Anshori, D., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2022). Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif The Role of Argument-Based Science Inquiry Learning Model to Improve. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 12(3), 1300–1310. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i3.2022
Rositawati, D. N. (2019). Kajian Berpikir Kritis Pada Metode Inkuiri. Prosiding SNFA (Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Aplikasinya), 3, 74. https://doi.org/10.20961/prosidingsnfa.v3i0.28514
Roviati, E., & Widodo, A. (2019). Kontribusi Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.30599/jti.v11i2.454
Sandoval, W. A., Enyedy, N., Redman, E. H., & Xiao, S. (2019). Organising a culture of argumentation in elementary science. International Journal of Science Education, 41(13), 1848–1869. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1641856
Saputri, M. R. A., Indah, R. N., & Rasyid, F. (2022). Debate, Critical Thinking Disposition, and Self-confidence: Do They Contribute to Speaking Proficiency? Premise: Journal of English Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v11i1.4533
Setiono, P., Yuliantini, N., Wurjinem, W., & Anggraini, D. (2021). Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning. ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal) : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 5(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.30651/else.v5i1.7039
Suliyanah, Fadillah, R. N., & Deta, U. A. (2020). The Process of Developing Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skill Using Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model in Senior High School on the Topic of Elasticity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012046
Sutiani, A., Situmorang, M., & Silalahi, A. (2021). Implementation of an Inquiry Learning Model with Science Literacy to Improve Student Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1428a
Taufik, A. N., Berlian, L., Iman, A., & Tarisa, R. (2023). Profil Kemampuan Argumentasi Lisan Berbasis Socioscientific Issues Mahasiswa Pendidikan IPA pada Mata Kuliah Mikrobiologi. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 832–838. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.3.832-838
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument: Updated edition. In The Uses of Argument: Updated Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Tursinawati, T., & Widodo, A. (2019). Pemahaman Nature of Science (NoS) Di Era Digital: Perspektif Dari Mahasiswa PGSD. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v3i1.13294
Urdanivia Alarcon, D. A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., Rucano Paucar, F. H., Cayani Caceres, K. S., & Machaca Viza, R. (2023). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487
Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2
Walenta, A. S., Nofirman, Rukhmana, T., Sitepu, E., Ramadhani, R., & Sitopu, J. W. (2024). Indonesian Research Journal on Education. Indonesian Research Journal on Education Web:, 4, 1149 – 1154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v4i4.1150
Watson, J. C., Arp, R., & King, S. (2023). Evaluating arguments. In Critical Thinking. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350232976.ch-002
Weiss, K. A., McDermott, M. A., & Hand, B. (2022). Characterising immersive argument-based inquiry learning environments in school-based education: a systematic literature review. Studies in Science Education, 58(1), 15–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1897931
Widhi, M. T. W., Hakim, A. R., Wulansari, N. I., Solahuddin, M. I., & Admoko, S. (2021). Analisis Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik Pada Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP) Dalam Memahami Konsep Fisika Dengan Metode Library Research. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.1.79-91
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Seluruh materi yang terdapat dalam situs ini dilindungi oleh undang-undang. Dilarang mengutip sebagian atau seluruh isi situs web ini untuk keperluan komersil tanpa persetujuan dewan penyunting jurnal ini.
- Apabila anda menemukan satu atau beberapa artikel yang terdapat dalam Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA yang melanggar atau berpotensi melanggar hak cipta yang anda miliki, silahkan laporkan kepada kami, melalui email pada Principle Contact.
- Aspek legal formal terhadap akses setiap informasi dan artikel yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini mengacu pada ketentuan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Semua Informasi yang terdapat di Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA bersifat akademik. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap kerugian yang terjadi karana penyalah gunaan informasi dari situs ini.