Pengembangan Modul Ajar Persamaan dan Fungsi Kuadrat Berbasis Understanding by Design untuk Memfasilitasi Six Facets of Understanding Siswa

Oktavia Shofi; Ratri Asmaya Puspa; Siti Ambarwati; Alifiani Alifiani

doi:10.37630/jpm.v16i4.4659

Authors

Oktavia Shofi Universitas Islam Malang
Ratri Asmaya Puspa Universitas Islam Malang
Siti Ambarwati SMA Negeri 7 Malang
Alifiani Alifiani Universitas Islam Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v16i4.4659

Keywords:

Modul Ajar, Persamaan dan Fungsi Kuadrat, Understanding by Deisgn, Ubd, Six Facets of Understanding

Abstract

Pemahaman konseptual matematis siswa pada materi persamaan dan fungsi kuadrat masih menjadi permasalahan yang perlu diperhatikan, ditandai dengan kecenderungan siswa menyelesaikan soal tanpa memahami konsep yang mendasarinya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan modul ajar persamaan dan fungsi kuadrat berbasis Understanding by Design (UbD) untuk memfasilitasi six facets of understanding siswa. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian pengembangan dengan model ADDIE. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 7 Malang. Hasil validasi menunjukkan rata-rata skor kevalidan 3,75 dan termasuk dalam kategori valid. Hasil implementasi menunjukkan bahwa siswa memperlihatkan indikator-indikator six facets of understanding secara bertahap, meliputi kemampuan menjelaskan konsep dengan bahasa sendiri, menafsirkan representasi matematis, mengaplikasikan konsep dalam situasi nyata, memahami keberagaman metode penyelesaian, memahami cara berpikir teman, serta merefleksikan pemahaman diri. Modul ajar berbasis UbD yang dikembangkan terbukti valid dan mampu memfasilitasi six facets of understanding siswa pada materi persamaan dan fungsi kuadrat.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen perangkat pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Amalia, N. (2025). Pengembangan E-Modul Ajar Berbasis Understanding by design (UbD) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa Materi Statistika Kelas X SMA. [Skripsi, Universitas Jambi].

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer.

Chusna, A. R., & Yustitia, V. (2024). Elementary school students’ numeracy ability in a socio-cultural context viewed by understanding mathematical concepts. Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v12i1.17126

Erbilgin, E., & Gningue, S. M. (2023). Using The onto-semiotic approach to analyze novice a;gebra learners’ meaning-making processes with different representations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10247-8

Fatmawati, W., Sutrisno, & Purwaningsih, C. (2023). Seminar nasional pendidikan profesi guru understanding by design berbasis pbl berdiferensiasi sebagai upaya peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis pada materi polinomial. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Profesi Guru, (November), 1599–1608.

Hidayat, A. W., Sabil, H., & Junita, R. (2024). Pengembangan e-modul berbasis understanding by design (UbD) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan spasial siswa materi bangun ruang sisi datar. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 4(December), 1566–1579. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i4.2182

Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Human, P. (1997). Makin Sense: Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Understanding.

Lahdenperä, J., Postareff, L., & Rämö, J. (2019). Supporting quality of learning in university mathematics : a comparison of two instructional designs. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5, 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-018-0080-y

Leber, J., Renkl, A., Nückles, M., & Wäschle, K. (2018). When the type of assessment counteracts teaching for understanding. Learning: Research and Practice, 4(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1285422

Mainali, B. (2021). Representation in teaching and learning mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 9(1), 0–21. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1111

Nahdi, D. S., & Jatisunda, M. G. (2020). Conceptual understanding and procedural knowledge : a case study on learning mathematics of fractional material in elementary sch. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/4/042037

Niam, M. A., & Prasetyowati, D. (2024). Understanding by design (UbD) pada Pembelajaran berbasis problem based learning (PBL) berbantuan LKPD untuk meningkatkan kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Profesional, 2(2), 169–179.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Result: The State of Learning and Equity in Education: I (Number 2). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Pramesti, N., & Dewi, L. (2023). The implementation of understanding by design approach in mathematics learning on elementary school. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning (JIML), 6(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v6i2.16304

Putra, Z. R. A., Pratama, C. E., Prabowo, M. S. P., & Nur Fauziyah. (2023). Pengembangan modul ajar matematika berdiferensiasi berbasis understanding by design (UbD). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 4, 128–139.

Qohar, A., Susiswo, Nasution, S. H., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2021). Development of android-based mathematics learning game on the topic of congruence and similarity. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 5(9), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1111

Rahmawati, A. N. L., Sa’dijah, C., & Sudirman, S. (2025). Exploring high school students ’ mathematical representation abilities: Translation from verbal to symbolic using higher-order thinking skills. TEM Journal, 14(3), 2442–2453. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM143

Rican, J., Chytrý, V., & Medová, J. (2022). Aspects of self-regulated learning and their influence on the mathematics achievement of fifth graders in the context of four different proclaimed curricula. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.963151

Rifan, N. M., & Latif, A. A. (2025). Constructive alignment as a framework for enhancing motivation and higher - order thinking in science classrooms: A systematic synthesis. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Sciences, IX(2454), 8078–8086. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS

Rittle-johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x

Sistermans, I. J. (2020). Integrating competency-based education with a case-based or problem-based learning approach in online health sciences. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(4), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09658-6

Sriani, N., Karniman, T. S., Mallo, B., & Hadjar, I. (2025). Analisis pemahaman konsep siswa pada materi persamaan kuadrat di SMP Kristen GPID sumbersari ditinjau dari gaya kognitif field independent. Aksioma: Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Tadulako, 14(1).

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Penerbit Alfabeta.

Sumandya, I. W., Mukminin, A., Widana, I. W., Suryawan, I. P. P., Wayan, N., & Permana, D. (2025). Development of an instrument to measure students’ and teachers ’ perceptions of understanding by design-based mathematics learning evaluation in inclusive schools. Discover Sustainability, 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01514-0

Syam, R., Dassa, A., & Khodidah, S. (2020). Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa dalam pemecahan masalah nonrutin pada materi fungsi kuadrat. Issues in Mathematics Education (IMED), 4(2), 188–198.

Tay, L. Y., Chan, M., Chong, S. K., Tan, J. Y., & Aiyoob, T. B. (2024). Learning of mathematics: A metacognitive experiences perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(3), 561–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10385-8

Vargas, H., Heradio, R., Farias, G., Lei, Z., & Torre, L. De. (2024). A pragmatic framework for assessing learning outcomes in competency-based courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, PP, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2023.3347273

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd ed.).

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2012). Understanding by Design ® Framework By Jay Mctighe and Grant Wiggins Introduction : What is UbD TM Framework ?. ASCD, 1–13.

Zega, R. K. P., Mendrofa, R. N., & Zega, Y. (2023). Development of a problem based learning module for class XI SMAK Arastamar Lotu academic year 2021 / 2022. QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(1), 160–167.