Development and Validation of a Reading and Numeracy Literacy Asessment Instrument on Stoichiometry Using LMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v16i4.4950Keywords:
Assessment Instruments, Reading Literacy, Numeracy Literacy, StoichiometryAbstract
According to PISA results, Indonesian students' reading and numeracy skills remain low. Therefore, a quality assessment tool is needed to evaluate students' reading and numeracy skills, especially in stoichiometry. The purpose of this study was to determine an appropriate instrument for assessment. The research method used was test design and development, as outlined in the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. The results showed that the instrument had adequate characteristics in content validation, empirical validity, reliability, difficulty level, and discriminatory power, with most falling into the good category. Therefore, this instrument can be used as an assessment to obtain evidence of the instrument's validity and psychometric characteristics. Further research is recommended to evaluate students' levels of critical thinking, reading literacy, and numeracy. In addition, the instrument can be tested on a more diverse sample and in more schools, expanding it to other chemistry materials.
Downloads
References
Adisti Yuliastrin, Deska Indri Yani, & Rian Vebrianto. (2025). Development of Assessment Instruments for Scientific Literacy Skills Tests for VII Grade Junior High School Students on Global Warming Material. Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa, 15(2), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v15i2.2576
AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association.
Ambarita, R. S., Wulan, N. S., & Wahyudin, D. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 2336–2344. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i5.836
Amelia, D., Lu’lua, N., Arafah, N. Q. B., Diaprina, S. R., & Maromy, T. C. (2024). Variabel yang Memengaruhi Kemampuan Literasi Membaca Siswa Indonesia : Analisis Berdasarkan Pendekatan MARS. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v9i2.4966
Amidi. (2024). Literasi Numerasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Digital. PRISMA: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 7, 998–1004.
Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran.
Arikunto, S. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. PT Bumi Aksara.
Arini, R., & Rahayu, Y. S. (2023). Profile of Critical Thinking Results Analyzed from Facione Indicators and Gender of Learners. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i4.328
Asbupel, F., Retnawati, H., Muhardis, Yovita, S., & Munadi, S. (2021). Analysis of students’ difficulties in answering questions on the chemistry national standardized school exam in kupang. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020), 528. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210305.032
Brinus, K. S. W., Makur, A. P., & Nendi, F. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa SMP. Mosharafa : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i2.558
Budhayanti, C. I. S. (2023). Penggunaan Learning Management System (Lms) Moodle Pada Perkuliahan Pendidikan Matematika Di Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Psiko Edukasi, 21(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.25170/psikoedukasi.v21i1.4439
Cicilia, Y., & Nursalim, N. (2019). Gaya dan Strategi Belajar Bahasa. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(3), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v1i3.30
Defrijon, Matra, E., Lazuardi, M. R., Kurniadi, Y., Yardi, L., & Julhadi. (2025). RELIABILITAS ALAT UKUR, JENIS-JENIS DAN FAKTOR FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHINYA. Jurnal Studi Multidisipliner, 9(1), 77–86.
Dongoran, F. R., & Hariani, P. P. (2025). Efektivitas Penggunaan Learning Management System ( LMS ) dalam Pembelajaran Akuntansi : Perspektif Guru dan Siswa. LIABILITIES: Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi, 8(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.30596/liabilities.v
Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., Astria, F. P., & Ratu, T. (2020). ANALISIS KUALITAS SOAL KEMAMPUAN MEMBEDAKAN RANGKAIAN SERI DAN PARALEL MELALUI TEORI TES KLASIK DAN MODEL RASCH. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i1.24080
Evangelista, E., Ariani, S. R. D., & Hastuti, B. (2022). ANALISIS KESULITAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X MIPA DI SMA NEGERI 1 PURWODADI PADA MATERI STOIKIOMETRI DENGAN INSTRUMEN TESLET PADAPEMBELAJARAN JARAK JAUH. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 11(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.20961/jpkim.v11i2.63974 211
Fatih, F. Al, Lubis, N. P., Hsb, K. N., Zulpan, & Arianto. (2026). Konsep Homogenitas dan Normalitas dalam Statistik serta Teknik Pengujiannya. Educational Journal, 1(3), 805–817. https://doi.org/10.63822/b98bqe88
Fatimah, L. U., & Alfath, K. (2019a). ANALISIS KESUKARAN SOAL, DAYA PEMBEDA DAN FUNGSI DISTRAKTOR. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 37–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36668/jal.v8i2.115
Fatimah, L. U., & Alfath, K. (2019b). ANALISIS KESUKARAN SOAL, DAYA PEMBEDA DAN FUNGSI DISTRAKTOR. Al-Manar, 8(2), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.36668/jal.v8i2.115
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research In educatIon (8th ed.) (Vol. 17). Mc Graw HIl.
Geiger, V., & Schmid, M. (2024). A critical turn in numeracy education and practice. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1363566
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. Studies in Inorganic Chemistry, 14(C), 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-88933-1.50023-4
Handayani, E. S., Fernando, F., Gaspersz, S., Ridwan, Ahmadin, & Kusumarini, E. (2025). Jurnal Edu Research Indonesian Institute For Corporate Learning And Studies (IICLS) Page 1522. EDU RESEARCH: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 6(2), 1522–1535. https://doi.org/10.47827/jer.v6i2.975
Hernani, Nurhadi, A. R., Mudzakir, A., Supriatna, A., Wahyuni, S., Depi, S. S., Hidayat, L. N., Irmawati, Fazarwati, R., Aulia, A., Muyassaroh, A., & Fadhilah, A. (2024). Design and Implementation of Contextual Chemistry Learning Oriented towards Science Literacy to Support the Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum [ Perancangan dan Implementasi Pembelajaran Kimia Kontekstual Berorientasi Literasi Sains untuk Mendukung. Jurnal Pengabdian Isola, 3(1), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpi.v3i1.70353
Hidayat, A., Rasmawan, R., Oktavianty, E., & Tanjungpura, U. (2024). PENINGKATAN AKTIVITAS DAN HASIL BELAJAR MELALUI PENDEKATAN KIMIA KIMIA KONTEKSTUAL PADA MATERI KONSEP MOL. JURNAL KAJIAN PEMBELAJARAN DAN KEILMUAN, 8(2019), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.26418/jurnalkpk.v8i2.77792
Janah, L., & Kurniawan, A. (2025). Development and Validation of a STEM-Based Minimum Competency Assessment Instrument for Reading Literacy and Numeracy in Stoichiometry. Panthera : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains Dan Terapan, 5(4), 953–966. https://doi.org/10.36312/panthera.v5i4.638
Jayanti, W. P., Nahadi, & Siswaningsih, W. (2026). Development and Validation of a STEM-Based Minimum Competency Assessment Instrument for Reading Literacy and Numeracy in Stoichiometry. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 12(5), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v12i5.14571
Kamaludin. (2024). MENDEKONSTRUKSI KEMEROSOTAN PERILAKU PESERTA DIDIK INDONESIA : STUDI KRISIS LITERASI , NUMERASI , DAN DISIPLIN DALAM BAYANG-BAYANG. Transformasi KEMENAG, 7(1), 132–144.
Karira, N. F., Sunarti, T., J, M. N. R., & Setyasih, W. (2023). Validitas Instrumen Tes Berbasis Literasi Sains untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA pada Materi Energi Terbarukan. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 12(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v12n2.p118-125
Khan, H. F., Qayyum, S., Beenish, H., Khan, R. A., & Iltaf, S. (2025). Determining the alignment of assessment items with curriculum goals through document analysis by addressing identified item flaws. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06736-4
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY. Pers. Psychol., 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Magdalena, I., Fauziah, S. N., Faziah, S. N., & Nupus, F. S. (2021). KESULITAN DAN DAYA BEDA BUTIR SOAL UJIAN AKHIR SEMESTER TEMA 7 KELAS III SDN KARET 1 SEPATAN. BINTANG : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sains, 3(2), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.36088/bintang.v3i2.1291
Malcolm, S. A., Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2019). The Validity and Reliability of an Instrument to Measure Physical Science Teachers’ Topic Specific Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Stoichiometry. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1633080
Metafisika, K. (2018). Analisis Ketepatan Deskripsi Konsep pada Buku Teks Kimia SMA pada materi. Jurnal Konfigurasi, 1(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.24014/konfigurasi.v2i1.4512
Muharromah, F., Fani, F. Al, & Ridho, A. R. (2025). RELIABILITAS ALAT UKUR: JENIS-JENIS, CARA PENGUKURAN, DAN FAKTOR FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHINYA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN. JIPDAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.65946/8qbjfd05
Nahadi, Siswaningsih, W., Purnawarman, P., Lestari, T., Febriani, A. E., & Rohmawati, T. (2022). Development of Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) on Chemical Materials. Moroccan Journal of Chemistry, 10(3), 452–463. https://doi.org/10.48317/IMIST.PRSM/morjchem-v10i3.33067
Novita, N., Mellyzar, & Herizal. (2021). Asesmen Nasional ( AN ): Pengetahuan dan Persepsi Calon Guru. JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v5i1.1568
OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 Results (Volume 1): The State of Learning and Equity in Education.
Oktaviani, C., Mauliza, M., & Nurhafidhah, N. (2026). Development of E-Assessment to Measure Critical Thinking in Chemistry Learning. EduChemia: Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v11i1.36935
Parhan, M., & Sutedja, B. (2019). PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN KONTEKSTUAL DALAM PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM DI UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA. TARBAWY: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education, 6(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.17509/t.v6vi2.20165
Pradita, E., Megawanti, P., & Yulianingsih. (2023). Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran , Daya Pembeda , dan Fungsi Distraktor. Himpunan: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika, 3(80), 109–118.
Pratama, C., Dimas Julian Pratama, Rakha Agusti Amanullah, Sani Safitri, & Rani Oktapiani. (2025). Relevansi Macam-Macam Pendekatan Pembelajaran Abad 21 terhadap Kebutuhan Siswa di Era Revolusi Digital. SOSIAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPS, 3(4), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.62383/sosial.v3i4.1362
Puspitasari, E., Abdullah, A., & Wati, M. (2025). Validasi: LKPD Terintegrasi Model Problem Based Learning untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Materi Asam Basa. Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa, 15(1), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v15i1.2405
Rachmawati, D., & Pradana, A. B. (2025). Analisis butir soal mata pelajaran ekonomi: validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, dan daya pembeda. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JUPE), 13(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.26740/jupe.v13n3.p273-284
Rahmawan, S., & Ashfarini, D. (2024). Identification of Misconceptions and Causes of Misconceptions in Stoichiometry Material Using Four Tier Multiple Choice (4TMC). Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 8(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v8i1.21649
Risti, S. (2025). Sistem E-Learning Berbasis Moodle. Jurnal Komputer Teknologi Informasi Sistem Informasi (JUKTISI), 4(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.62712/juktisi.v4i1.358
Rohim, D. C., Rahmawati, S., & Ganestri, I. D. (2021). Konsep Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Sekolah Dasar untuk Siswa. Jurnal Varidika, 33(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v33i1.14993
Rohman, A., Islam, U., & Sunan, N. (2022). Literasi dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis di Era Disrupsi. EUNOIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 2(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.30821/eunoia.v2i1.1318
Salim, A., & Juita, N. (2025). Analisis Pentingnya Pemanfaatan dari Instrumen Penelitian. AL-AFKAR: Journal for Islamic Studies, 8(4), 880–888. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i4.1700.Analysis
Saputri, H. A., Zulhijrah, Larasati, N. J., & Shaleh. (2023). ANALISIS INSTRUMEN ASSESMEN : VALIDITAS, RELIABILITAS, TINGKAT KESUKARAN DAN DAYA BEDA BUTIR SOAL. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD FKIP Universitas Mandiri, 09(05), 2986–2995. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i5.2268
Sari, F. M., Hadiati, R. N., & Sihotang, W. P. (2023). Analisis Korelasi Pearson Jumlah Penduduk dengan Jumlah Kendaraan Bermotor di Provinsi Jambi. Multi Proximity: Jurnal Statistika Universitas Jambi, 2(1), 39–44.
Selaras, G. H., Ahda, Y., & Alberida, H. (2019). The Validity and Reliability of The Instrument Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skill on The Biological Scope Materials. Bioeducation Journal, 3(2), 124–125. https://doi.org/10.24036/bioedu.v3i2.242
Setiyawan, R. A., & Wijayanti, P. S. (2020). Analisis kualitas instrumen untuk mengukur kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa selama pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi. Lebesgue : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika Dan Statistika, 1(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v1i2 ANALISIS
Skills, P. for 21st C. (2019). PARTNERSHIP FOR 21ST CENTURY SKILLS- Framework for 21st Century Learning.
Sudiana, R. (2016). EFEKTIFITAS PENGGUNAAN LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BERBASIS ONLINE. JPPM: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 9(2), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v9i2.998
Sugiono, Noerdjanah, & Wahyu, A. (2020). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Alat Ukur SG Posture Evaluation. Poltekkes Surakarta: Jurnal Keterapian Fisik, 5(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.37341/jkf.v5i1.167
Sumarno. (2020). ANALISIS ISI DALAM PENELITIAN PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA DAN SASTRA. Edukasi: Lingua SantrA, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.47637/elsa.v18i2.299
Utami, N. D. (2024). Penerapan Pendekatan Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. PGSD: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47134/pgsd.v1i2.134
Utami, S. R., & Kusmayati, N. B. (2024). PENGENALAN LITERASI DAN NUMERASI PADA GURU-GURU BAHASA INDONESIA DAN NON-EKSAKTA SMP. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 13(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jwl.v13i1.69055
Wirati, N. N. (2023). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Journal of Education Action Research, 7(4), 508–517. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v7i4.66558 Penerapan
Wulan. (2023). ANALISIS CAPAIAN PEMBELAJARAN KURIKULUM MERDEKA PADA MATERI ASAM BASA. TSAQOFAH: Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia, 4, 58–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v4i1.2129
Yadnyawati, I. A. G. (2019). Evaluasi Pembelajaran (I. K. Suda (ed.)). UNHI PRESS 2019.
Yustiqvar, M., Hadisaputra, S., & Gunawan, G. (2019). ANALYSIS OF STUDENT CONCEPTS MASTERY FOR THE INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA BASED GREEN CHEMISTRY APPLICATION. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 14(3), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v14i2.1299
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anugrance Citra Rahma Setiyani, Triannisa Rahmawati, Nahadi Nahadi, Wiwi Siswaningsih

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Seluruh materi yang terdapat dalam situs ini dilindungi oleh undang-undang. Dilarang mengutip sebagian atau seluruh isi situs web ini untuk keperluan komersil tanpa persetujuan dewan penyunting jurnal ini.
- Apabila anda menemukan satu atau beberapa artikel yang terdapat dalam Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA yang melanggar atau berpotensi melanggar hak cipta yang anda miliki, silahkan laporkan kepada kami, melalui email pada Principle Contact.
- Aspek legal formal terhadap akses setiap informasi dan artikel yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini mengacu pada ketentuan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Semua Informasi yang terdapat di Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA bersifat akademik. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap kerugian yang terjadi karana penyalah gunaan informasi dari situs ini.









