The Effect of Discovery Learning Model On The Learning Outcomes of Sciences (Physics) In Junior High School Students

Januaris Pane; Bajongga Silaban; Viktor Alexander Baene; Hebron Pardede; Juliper Nainggolan; Jojor Silalahi

doi:10.37630/jpm.v13i2.921

Januaris Pane Nommensen HKBP University Medan
Bajongga Silaban Nommensen HKBP University Medan
Viktor Alexander Baene Nommensen HKBP University Medan
Hebron Pardede Nommensen HKBP University Medan
Juliper Nainggolan Nommensen HKBP University Medan
Jojor Silalahi Nommensen HKBP University Medan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v13i2.921

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the discovery learning model on student learning outcomes on simple aircraft material in class VIII UPT SMP Negeri 12 Medan. The research method used was a quasi experiment with a population of 284 students of class VIII UPT SMP Negeri 12 Medan. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling, namely class VIII 6 and VIII 7 each as an experimental class and control class. The instrument used was a multiple choice test of learning outcomes as many as 20 questions. Before being given treatment, a prerequisite test was first carried out to determine whether the sample came from a normally distributed and homogeneous population. Furthermore, the pretest was given to the experimental class and control class with an average score of 48.83 and 48.67 respectively with a standard deviation of 16.59 and 16.45, After the treatment was followed by giving the posttest, the average score was 80.83 and 66.00 respectively with a standard deviation of 11.52 and 15.05. To see the difference in the two classes, a one-sided t-test was conducted with  = 0.05, it was found that the t-count was greater than the t-table which indicated that there was a difference in learning outcomes in the two classes. Furthermore, the magnitude of the effect of the discovery learning model on learning outcomes was carried out a simple regression test, with the equation "Y" ̅ = "57.19 + 0.11X". Finally it was concluded that there was a significant effect of the discovery learning model on the learning outcomes of students of SMP Negeri 12 Medan on simple aircraft material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords: Discovery Learning, Learning Outcomes, Science (Physics)

References

Abidah, S. D., & Yuliani, Y. (2020). The Validity and Practicality of Student Worksheet Based on Guided Discovery to Practice Integrated Science Process Skills in Class XII Enzyme Submaterials. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 9(3), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v9n3.p422-432

Ana, N. Y. (2018). The Use of Discovery Learning Model in Improving Student Learning Outcomes in Elementary School. Scientific Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v2i1.13851

Batubara, I. H. (2019). Improving Student’s Critical Thinking Ability Through Guided Discovery Learning Methods Assisted by Geogebra. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(2), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i2.1371

Dinantika, H. K., Viyanti, & Suyatna, A. (2020). Design of student worksheet to accommodate learning style and initial knowledge and reduce the differences of scientific reasoning and argumentation performance. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3453752

Festiawan, R. (2020). Learning and learning approaches. Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, 1-17.

Hasriadi. (2022). Learning Strategies (Firman (ed.)). The Eye Of The Word Of Inspiration.

Hendrizal, Jendriadi, R. Z. (2018). Development of Discovery Learning Model Integrated with Character Education for Integrated Thematic Learning (pp. 1-98).

Hidayati, H. (2022). Learning to Learn in the Lecture Method.

Malik, R. S. (2018). Educational Challenges in 21St Century and Sustainable Development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsder.v2i1.12266

Maulidah, E. (2019). Character Building and 21st Century Skills in Learning in the Era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Proceedings of the PGSD National Seminar, 138-146.pare. (2019). Peqguruang: Conference Series. 1(September), 1–8.

Rahman, A., Munandar, S. A., Fitriani, A., Karlina, Y., & Yumriani. (2022). Definition of Education, Science of Education and Elements of Education. Al Urwatul Wutsqa: Islamic Education Studies, 2(1), 1-8.

Santosa. (2020). Inquiri-Discovery Learning Teaching Materials. Denpasar Religious Education and Training Center.

Saragih, N, A., Madya, S., Siregar, R.A., Saragih, W. (2021). Written Corrective Feedback : Students ’ Perception. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 8(2), 676–690. eric.ed.gov/?q=feedback+strategies&pg=2&id=EJ1294325

Septiani. (n.d.). Application of AIR Learning Model (Auditory Intellectually Repetition) to Improve Learning Outcomes in Economics Subjects of X IPS 2 class students in SMA Negeri 14 Pekanbaru. 90.

Simamora, R. E., Saragih, S., & Hasratuddin, H. (2018). Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3966

Siti Ma’rifah Setiawati, S.P, S. (2018). 'HELPER" Journal of Guidance and Counseling FKIP UNIPA. UNIPA FETT Guidance and Counseling Journal, 35(1), 31-46.

Sudjana. (2016). Statistical Methods (6th.ed). Tarsito Bandung.

Sugiyono. (2018). Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods. Alfabeta.

Tuckman, B. W., And, & Harper, B. E. (2012). Conducting Educational Research (Sixth Edit). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Wardana & Ahdar Djamaluddin. (2021). Learning and Learning Theory, Design, Learning Models and Learning Achievement.